A view of the Hazelwood Green development site; Credit: Carnegie Mellon University
Logan Montoya - May 2026
In the past year a new concept of revitalizing the rust belt economically has been introduced, that of constructing data centers in small to medium sized population areas. These data centers however, have not been widely accepted but instead have been met with opposition by environmental groups and those wishing to maintain local ways of life. This opposition has been broadcasted widely but the question that arises is why are data centers continuing to be constructed and why are some governments advocating for their communities to be their next site despite vocal opposition?
First, tax revenue. While opposition groups largely point to the environmental impacts of data centers, the water that they drain and the ecosystems that they impact, one common counterargument that has been presented is increased tax revenue to solve these issues. For instance, in a proposal just outside the city of St. Louis, Missouri one data center alone is expected to generate for the city, county and state $213 million in property taxes alone over the next decade (Civiq Iq). This tax revenue when funneled into public coffers fuels the running of schools, the maintenance and construction of roads and other public initiatives like environmental preservation. For some localities these added benefits outway any immediate negative impacts when in a long term view the monetary value that they add can counteract losses.
Second, jobs. When data centers are constructed hundreds if not thousands of new jobs in the construction of the data centers are created or sustained. These jobs range from those doing the actual building to those designing them and managing the project's success. These jobs provide local families with the financial stability to pursue their goals, indulge in their comfort and act on their personal initiatives. When citizens have financial security attributed to the acts of local government, votes can be secured and governments can remain in power. This, however is just one reason under the jobs factor and is not primary.
Third, economic stimulation. In post rustbelt economies many communities have faced declining populations and jobs. Data centers however, have helped stimulate local economies by allowing those in the trades which comprise a large portion of rust belt populations to engage with data centers either through their construction or through their operation after they are constructed. Additionally, after the construction of data centers in some cases increased economic investment has followed. This investment has been seen through the increased presence of consumer services like restaurants, salons and grocery stores. With these added economic components new jobs are created, more families can live in an area, increased tax revenue can be generated and rust belt communities can be stimulated after a manufacturing exodus. This economic stimulation further promotes the perception of government acting in the public's best interest in turn resolving in increased favor towards standing governments. At the ballot box however, citizens will decide whether environmental risks were warranted.
Governments in the pursuit of these factors allow data centers to be constructed and expanded.
------
For Further Reference:
------
Where Are Data Centers Opening and How Much Are Cities Making? 2025 Municipal Revenue Analysis - Civic IQ Blog. (2026, January 6). Civic IQ Blog. https://blogs.civiciq.com/2026/01/06/where-are-data-centers-opening-and-how-much-are-cities-making-2025-municipal-revenue-analysis/